Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

21 Evaluatie van implementatieprojecten: observationele evaluaties

Auteurs : prof.dr. Michel Wensing, prof.dr. Richard Grol

Gepubliceerd in: Implementatie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Een gerandomiseerd expertiment is het beste studiedesign voor het vaststellen van de effectiviteit van implementatiestrategieën, maar dit design is niet altijd uitvoerbaar.
Observationele evaluaties kunnen inzicht geven in het verloop, de uitkomsten en (mogelijke) determinanten van veranderingsprocessen. Het toeschrijven van bereikte resultaten aan een specifieke interventie is meestal niet mogelijk in deze evaluaties.
Observationele evaluaties zijn beschrijvend (dwarsdoorsnedestudie, gevalstudie en ontwikkelingsstudie) of vergelijkend (studie met enkele grote clusters, cohortstudie met referentiegroep en cohortstudie zonder referentiegroep).
De data-analyse in observationele evaluaties is vaak complex.

vorige hoofdstuk 20 Effecten van implementatie: gecontroleerde evaluaties

volgende hoofdstuk 22 Evaluatie van het proces van implementatie

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(27).

Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strenghtening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:573-7.CrossRef

Ansari W El, Phillips CJ, Zwi AB. Collaboration and partnerships: developing the evidence base. Health & Social Care in the Community 2001;9:215-27.CrossRef

Argyris C. On organisational learning. Cambridge Mass: Blackwell Business, 1992.

Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plesk PE. Statistical process control as a tool for research and health care improvement. In: Grol R, Baker R, Moss F (eds). Quality improvement research. Understanding the science of change in health care. London: BMJ Books, 2003.

Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects of using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force report –Part 1. Val Health 2009;12:1044-52.CrossRef

Bhutta A, Gilliam C, Honeycutt M, et al. Reduction of bloodstream infections associated with catheters in paediatric intensive care unit: stepwise approach. BMJ 2007;334:362-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. BMJ 1996;312:1215-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Claxton K, Neuman PJ, Araki SS, Weinstein MC. The value of information: an application to a policy model of Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:38-55.CrossRefPubMed

Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(27).

Eccles M, Deverill M, McColl E, Richardson H. A national survey of audit activity across the primary-secondary care interface. Qual Health Care 1996;5:193-200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harvey G, Wensing M. Methods for evaluation of small-scale improvement projects. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:210-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hermens PMG, Tacken MAJB, Hulscher MEJL, et al. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in general practices in the Netherlands. Prev Med 2000;31:35-42.CrossRef

Horwitz LL, Kosiborod M, Lin Z, Krumholz HM. Changes in outcomes for internal medicine inpatients after work-hour regulations. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:97-103CrossRefPubMed

Hulscher MEJL, Drenth BB van, Wouden JC van der, et al. Changing preventive practice: a controlled trial on the effects of outreach visits to organize prevention of cardiovascular disease. Qual Health Care 1997;6:19-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Johnston G, Crombie IK, Alder et al. Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit. Qual Health Care 2000;9:23-36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Laurant M, Harmsen M, Wensing M. Implementatie van beweegprogramma’s voor ouderen. Belemmerende en bevorderende factoren voor succesvolle implementatie. Nijmegen: Wok, januari 2003.

Murray DM. Design and analysis of community trials: Lessons from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:569-75.PubMed

Nutbeam D. Evaluating health promotion: Progress, problems and solutations. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.

Øvretveit J, Gustafson D. Evaluation of quality improvement programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:270-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Robb E, Jarman J, Suntharalingam G, et al. Using care bundles to reduce in-hospital mortality: quantitative survey. BMJ 2010;340:861-3.CrossRef

Russell IT, Russell D. Statistical issues in medical audit. In: Marinker M (ed.). Medical Audit and General Practice. London: MSD Foundation, 1990.

Schon DA. Educating the reflective practitioner. London: Jossey Brass, 1988.

Schouten LMT, Verhoeven MAWM, Hoeven JG van der, Schellekens W. Intensive care aanzienlijk verbeterd. Med Contact 2002;57:91.

Selim P, Bashford C, Grossman C. Evidence-based practice: tap water cleansing of leg ulcers in the community. J Clin Nurs 2001;10:372-9.CrossRefPubMed

Spiegelhalter D, Grigg O, Kinsman R, Treasure T. Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgey. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:7-13.CrossRefPubMed

Vos L, Dückers MLA, Wagner C, van Merode GG. Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesign: a multiple case study. Implemen Sci 2010;5:19.CrossRef

Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R et al. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:111-57.CrossRef

Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage, 1989.

Titel: 21 Evaluatie van implementatieprojecten: observationele evaluaties
Auteurs: prof.dr. Michel Wensing
prof.dr. Richard Grol
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Implementatie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1076-0

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1077-7

Copyright: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1077-7_21

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen