Skip to main content
Top

2007 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

2 Waarnemingsmethoden in kwalitatief onderzoek

Auteur : Tony Hak

Gepubliceerd in: Kwalitatief onderzoek

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Bij de term kwalitatief onderzoek denkt men vrijwel meteen aan bepaalde vormen van gegevensverzameling of ‘waarneming’ – de term die ik in deze bijdrage zal gebruiken –, zoals diepte-interviews en focusgroepen. Toen het bmj in 1995 voor het eerst een serie artikelen wijdde aan kwalitatief onderzoek – zoals H&W nu – werden er dan ook aparte bijdragen gewijd aan het kwalitatieve interview en aan de focusgroep.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Britten N. Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. bmj 1995;311:251-3. Britten N. Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. bmj 1995;311:251-3.
2.
go back to reference Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. bmj 1995;311:299-302. Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. bmj 1995;311:299-302.
3.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research: Observational methods in health care settings. bmj 1995;311:182-4. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative Research: Observational methods in health care settings. bmj 1995;311:182-4.
4.
go back to reference Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. bmj 1995;311:376-80. Jones J, Hunter D. Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. bmj 1995;311:376-80.
5.
go back to reference Keen J, Packwood T. Qualitative Research: Case study evaluation. bmj 1995;311:444-6. Keen J, Packwood T. Qualitative Research: Case study evaluation. bmj 1995;311:444-6.
6.
go back to reference The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, Wal G van der. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. bmj 2000;321:1376-81. The AM, Hak T, Koëter G, Wal G van der. Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. bmj 2000;321:1376-81.
7.
go back to reference Savage J. Ethnography and health care. bmj 2000;321:1400-2. Savage J. Ethnography and health care. bmj 2000;321:1400-2.
8.
go back to reference Wester F, Hak T. De methodologie van kwalitatief onderzoek. In: Hak T, Wester F, redactie. Kwalitatief onderzoek: de praktijk. Waarneming, analyse en reflectie. Amsterdam: siswo, 2003:7-17. Wester F, Hak T. De methodologie van kwalitatief onderzoek. In: Hak T, Wester F, redactie. Kwalitatief onderzoek: de praktijk. Waarneming, analyse en reflectie. Amsterdam: siswo, 2003:7-17.
9.
go back to reference Wester F. Strategieën voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho, 1995. Wester F. Strategieën voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Muiderberg: Coutinho, 1995.
10.
go back to reference Smaling A. Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1978. Smaling A. Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1978.
12.
go back to reference Merton RK, Fiske M, Kendall PL. The focused interview. A manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe (Il): Free Press, 1956. Merton RK, Fiske M, Kendall PL. The focused interview. A manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe (Il): Free Press, 1956.
13.
go back to reference Barrows HS. Stimulated recall (personalized assessment of clinical reasoning). Carbondale (Il): Southern Illinois University Medical School, 2000. Barrows HS. Stimulated recall (personalized assessment of clinical reasoning). Carbondale (Il): Southern Illinois University Medical School, 2000.
14.
go back to reference Sudnow D. Passing on: the social organization of dying. Englewood Cliffs (nj): Prentice-Hall, 1967. Sudnow D. Passing on: the social organization of dying. Englewood Cliffs (nj): Prentice-Hall, 1967.
15.
go back to reference Hak T. ‘Text’ and ‘con-text’: Talk bias in studies of health care work. In: Sarangi S, Roberts C, editors. Talk, work and the institutional order. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 1999:427-51.CrossRef Hak T. ‘Text’ and ‘con-text’: Talk bias in studies of health care work. In: Sarangi S, Roberts C, editors. Talk, work and the institutional order. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 1999:427-51.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L . Unobtrusive measure. Non-reactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966. Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L . Unobtrusive measure. Non-reactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
17.
go back to reference Lloyd-Jones G. A multiple case study of the first year student perspective in a medical undergraduate pbl curriculum. Proefschrift. University of Liverpool, Department of Primary Care, 2002. Lloyd-Jones G. A multiple case study of the first year student perspective in a medical undergraduate pbl curriculum. Proefschrift. University of Liverpool, Department of Primary Care, 2002.
18.
go back to reference Lloyd-Jones G, Hak T. Self-directed learning and student pragmatism. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:61-73.PubMedCrossRef Lloyd-Jones G, Hak T. Self-directed learning and student pragmatism. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004;9:61-73.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
2 Waarnemingsmethoden in kwalitatief onderzoek
Auteur
Tony Hak
Copyright
2007
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6373-5_2