Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

13 Feedback en reminders

Auteurs : prof.dr. Trudy van der Weijden, prof.dr. Richard Grol

Gepubliceerd in: Implementatie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Feedback en reminders kunnen effectief zijn, maar het effect is afhankelijk van de aard en kwaliteit van de onderliggende innovatie, inzicht in knelpunten voor toepassing van die innovatie, en de mate waarin de feedback of reminders op die knelpunten zijn toegesneden.
Het effect van feedback of reminders wordt beïnvloed door de motivatie van de ontvanger, de timing en frequentie van de feedback en reminders, en het type gegevens waarover de feedback of de reminder gaat (bron, validiteit, hoeveelheid, vorm, actief of passief format).
Het weergeven van vergelijkende informatie over collega’s kan de zorgverlener stimuleren in het bestuderen van de feedback. Toevoegen van intercollegiale toetsing aan deze feedback kan het effect versterken.
Feedback en reminders zijn relatief veel onderzocht, en lijken met name geschikt voor implementatie van veranderingen in aanvullende diagnostiek, prescriptie en primaire preventie.

vorige hoofdstuk 12 Educatieve strategieën

volgende hoofdstuk 14 Patiëntgerichte strategieën

Durieux P, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Niès J, Walton RT, Rajeswaran A, RègeWaltherM, Harvey E, Burnand B.Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002894. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub2.

Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD000259. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2.

Austin SM, Balas EA, Mitchell JA, Ewigman GB. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994;121-4.

Balas EA, Boren SA, Brown GD, et al. Effect of physician profiling on utilization. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:584-90.CrossRefPubMed

Beilby J, Silagy CA. Trials of providing costing information to general practitioners: a systematic review. MJA 1997;167:89-92.PubMed

Bennett JW, Glasziou PP. Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Austr 2003;178:217-22.

Bindels R, Clercq PA de, Winkens RAG, Hasman A. A test ordering system with automated reminders for primary care based on practice guidelines. Int J Med Inf 2000;58-59:219-33.CrossRef

Bindels R, Hasman A, Wersch JWJ, Talmon J, Winkens RAG. Evaluation of an automated test ordering and feedback system for general practitioners in daily practice. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:705-12.CrossRefPubMed

Buntinx F, Winkens R, Grol R, Knottnerus JA. Influencing diagnostic and preventive performance in ambulatory care by feedback and reminders. A review. Fam Pract 1993;10(2):219-28.CrossRefPubMed

Denneboom W. Improving medication safety in the elderly. Proefschrift. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 2008.

Durieux P, Nizard R, Ravaud P, Mounier N. Lepage E. A Clinical Decision Support System for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Effect on Physician Behavior. JAMA 2000; 283:2816-21.CrossRefPubMed

Durieux P, Trinquart L, Colombet I, Niès J, Walton RT, Rajeswaran A, Rège Walther M, Harvey E, Burnand B. Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD002894. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894. pub2.

Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physician’s practices. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1271-3.CrossRefPubMed

Grimshaw JM, Russel IT. Achieving Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigourous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342:1317-22.CrossRefPubMed

Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R et al. Changing provider behaviour. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39:S2-S45.CrossRef

Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, Maclennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1-84.CrossRef

Grol R, Lawrence M. Quality improvement by peer review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Heselmans A, Velde S van de, Donceel P, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D. Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settings - a systematic review. Implementation Science 2009;4:82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. A systematic review. JAMA 1998;280:1339-46.PubMed

Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:2871-9.PubMed

Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005;352:969-77.CrossRefPubMed

Liu J, Wyatt JC, Altman DG. Decision tools in health care:focus on the problem, not the solution, BMC Med. Inform Decis Mak 2006;6:4.CrossRef

Martens JD, Weijden T van der, Severens JL, et al. The effect of computer reminders on GPs’ prescribing behaviour: a cluster randomized trial. Int J Med Inform 2007;76 (Suppl. 3): S403-16.CrossRefPubMed

Martens JD, Weijden T van der, Winkens RAG, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a computerised system with automated reminders for prescribing behaviour in primary care. Int J Med Inform 2008;77:199-207.CrossRefPubMed

Mollon B, Chong JJR, Holbrook AM, et al. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Inform Decis 2009;9:11.CrossRef

Niès J, Colombet I, Degoulet P, Durieux P. Determinants of Success for Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems Integrated into CPOE Systems: a Systematic Review. AMIA Symposium Proceedings 2006;594-8.

O’Connell D, Henry D, Tomlins R. Randomised controlled trial of effect of feedback on general practitioners prescribing in Australia. BMJ 1999;318:507-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Overeem K, Faber MJ, Arah OA, et al. Doctor performance assessment in daily practice: does it help doctors or not? A systematic review. Med Educ 2007;4b1:1039-49.CrossRef

Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1551-6.CrossRefPubMed

Pearson SA, Moxey A, Robertson J, et al. Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007). BMC Health Services Research 2009;9:154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schedlbauer A, Prasad V, Mulvaney C, et al. What evidence supports the use of computerized alerts and prompts to improve clinicians’ prescribing behavior? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16(4):531-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3(6):399-409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, et al. Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review. CMAJ 2010;182(5):E216-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thorsen T, Mäkelä M, eds. Changing professional practice. Theory and practice of clinical guidelines implementation. DSI Rapport 99.05. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development, 1999.

Veer SN van der, Keizer NF de, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers. Int J Med Informatics 2010;79: 305-23.CrossRef

Verstappen W, Weijden T van der, Sijbrandij J, et al. Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians. A randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:2407-12.CrossRefPubMed

Verstappen WH, Weijden T van der, Sijbrandij J, et al. Diagnostisch toetsoverleg (DTO) vermindert overbodig gebruik aanvullende diagnostiek door huisartsen. Huisarts Wet 2004;47(3):127-32.CrossRef

Walton R, Harvey E, Dovey S, Freemantle N. Computerised advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001, issue 1.

Wensing M, Broge B, Kaufmann-Kolle P, et al. Quality circles to improve prescribing patterns in primary care: what is their actual impact? J Eval Clin pract 2004;10:457-66.CrossRefPubMed

Winkens RAG, Pop P, Grol RPTM, et al. Effect of feedback on test ordering behaviour of general practitioners. BMJ 1992;304:1093-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Winkens RA, Pop P, Bugter-Maessen AM, et al. Randomised controlled trial of routine individual feedback to improve rationality and reduce numbers of test requests. Lancet 1995;345: 498-502.CrossRefPubMed

Winkens RA, Pop P, Grol R, et al. Effects of routine individual feedback over nine years on general practitioners’ requests for tests. BMJ 1996;312:490.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yourman L, Concato J, Agostini JV. Use of computer decision support interventions to improve medication prescribing in older adults: A systematic review. Am Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008;6:119-29.CrossRef

Titel: 13 Feedback en reminders
Auteurs: prof.dr. Trudy van der Weijden
prof.dr. Richard Grol
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Implementatie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1076-0

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1077-7

Copyright: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1077-7_13

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen