Skip to main content
Top

2007 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

11 Meta-etnografie en de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek

Auteur : Prof. dr. E. Vermeire

Gepubliceerd in: Kwalitatief onderzoek

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk staat de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek centraal. Om evidence-based beslissingen te nemen in de gezondheidszorg, vooral bij complexe zorgvragen, wordt in toenemende mate een beroep gedaan op evidence uit kwalitatief onderzoek. De confrontatie met het groeiend aantal kwalitatieve studies verplicht de gebruiker om op een kritische wijze deze informatie samen te vatten. Dit ‘samenvatten’ is de kern van dit hoofdstuk.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the Health Professionals 2002;25:12-37. CrossRef Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the Health Professionals 2002;25:12-37. CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Glass GV, Smith ML, McGaw B. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, ca: Sage, 1981. Glass GV, Smith ML, McGaw B. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, ca: Sage, 1981.
4.
go back to reference Vermeire E. The study of research evidence synthesis, applied to adherence to treatment recommendations in people living with type 2 diabetes. Proefschrift. Antwerpen: University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine, 2005. Vermeire E. The study of research evidence synthesis, applied to adherence to treatment recommendations in people living with type 2 diabetes. Proefschrift. Antwerpen: University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine, 2005.
5.
go back to reference Davies Ph. The Magenta Book. Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. Londen: Government Chie Social Researcher’s Office. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Cabinet Office, 2003. Davies Ph. The Magenta Book. Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. Londen: Government Chie Social Researcher’s Office. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Cabinet Office, 2003.
6.
go back to reference Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7(4):209-15. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7(4):209-15.
7.
go back to reference Vermeire E. Synthese als permanente uitdaging (Editoriaal). Minerva 2003;2(3):38-9. Vermeire E. Synthese als permanente uitdaging (Editoriaal). Minerva 2003;2(3):38-9.
8.
go back to reference Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8(3):341-51. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8(3):341-51.
9.
go back to reference Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Research in Nursing and Health 1997;20(4):365-71. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Research in Nursing and Health 1997;20(4):365-71.
10.
go back to reference Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2001. Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2001.
11.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analsysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (moose) group. jama 2000;283(15):2008-12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analsysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (moose) group. jama 2000;283(15):2008-12.
12.
go back to reference Strike K, Posner G. Types of syntheses and their criteria. In: Ward S, Reed L, eds. Knowledge structure and use. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983. Strike K, Posner G. Types of syntheses and their criteria. In: Ward S, Reed L, eds. Knowledge structure and use. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983.
13.
go back to reference Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Qualitative research methods series 11. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Qualitative research methods series 11. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988.
14.
go back to reference Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671-84.PubMedCrossRef Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671-84.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:794-800.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:794-800.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci med 2005;61(2):417-30.PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci med 2005;61(2):417-30.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, ca: Sage Publications, 1988. Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, ca: Sage Publications, 1988.
20.
go back to reference Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Coenen S, Wens J, Denekens J. The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: a qualitative study from the patient’s perspective. Pract Diab Int 2003;20(6):209-14.CrossRef Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Coenen S, Wens J, Denekens J. The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: a qualitative study from the patient’s perspective. Pract Diab Int 2003;20(6):209-14.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage, 1988. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage, 1988.
22.
go back to reference Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds). A companion to qualitative research. Londen: Sage Publications, 2004. Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds). A companion to qualitative research. Londen: Sage Publications, 2004.
Metagegevens
Titel
11 Meta-etnografie en de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek
Auteur
Prof. dr. E. Vermeire
Copyright
2007
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6373-5_11