Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2010 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

7. Vrouwelijke genitaliën

Auteurs : Drs. E. Hageraats, Drs. A.P. Gijsen

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Extract

Doel van het onderzoek van de vrouwelijke genitaliën is om zich een beeld te kunnen vormen van de toestand van de tractus genitalis van de vrouw. Door het gynaecologisch onderzoek is het mogelijk vulva, vagina, cervix, uterus, eileiders en ovaria te beoordelen. Zo kan de mogelijke aanwezigheid van bepaalde aandoeningen waarschijnlijk of minder waarschijnlijk gemaakt worden. Bovendien kan het onderzoek een rol spelen bij het evalueren van (gynaecologische oorzaken van) onderbuiksklachten. …

vorige hoofdstuk Buik

volgende hoofdstuk Mannelijke genitaliën

Singh V, Sehgal A. Screening for cervical cancer by direct inspection. BMJ. 1992;304(6826):534-5.

Chirenje ZM, Chipato T. Visual inspection of the cervix as a primary means of cervical cancer screening: results of a pilot study. Centr Afr J Med. 1999;45(2):30-3.

Vooijs GP. Endocervical brush device. Lancet. 1989;1(8641):784.

Fokke HE. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 1993;48(2):103-6.

Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, Cariaggi MP, Dalla Palma P, Naldoni C, et al. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2007;335:28.

Kirschner B, Simonsen K, Junge J. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer. Cytopathol-ogy. 2006;17:187-94.

Harrison WN, Teale AM, Jones SP, Mohammed MA. The impact of the introduction of liquid based cytology on the variation in the proportion of inadequate samples between GP practices. BMC. 2007;7:191.

Boon ME, Rijkaart DC, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Korporaal H. Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(9);644-8.

Klinkhamer PJ, Meerding WJ, Rosier PF, Hanselaar AG. Liquid-based cervical cytology, a review of the literature with methods of evidence-based medicine. Cancer. 2003;99(5):263-71.

10.

Strauss RA, Eucker B, Savitz DA, Thorp JM Jr. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis from self-obtained vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005;13(1):31-5.

11.

Shafer MA, Pantell RH, Schachter J. Is the routine pelvic examination needed with the advent of urine-based screening for sexually transmitted disease? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999b;153(2):119-25.

12.

Hoffman MS, Cardosi RJ, Roberts WS, Fiorica JV, Grendys EC Jr, Griffin D. Accuracy of pelvic examination in the assessment of patients with operable cervical cancer. Am J Obst Gyn. 2004;190:986-93.

13.

Postema S, Pattynama PM, van den Berg-Huysmans A, Peters LW, Kenter G, Trimbos JB. Effect of MRI on therapeutic decisions in invasive cervical carcinoma, direct comparison with the pelvic examination as a preoperative test. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:485-9.

14.

Marks C. Diagnosing PID getting the balance right. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11(8):545-47.

15.

Buckley R. History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: validation of a clinical prediction model. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(5):644-7.

16.

Wong E. Ectopic pregnancy – a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2000;7(3):189-94.

17.

Dart RG. Predictive value of history and p.e. in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33(3):283-90.

18.

Close RJ. Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med. 2001;175(4):240-4.

19.

Essed G, Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman N. Fysische diagnostiek- het vaginaal toucher. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001;154(44).

20.

Dekel A, Farhi J, Levy T, Orvieto R, Shalev Y, Dicker D. Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri-correlation with bimanual examination. Eur J Obst Gyn Reproduct Biol. 1998;80:205-7.

21.

Padilla L, Radosevich D. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int J Gyn Obst. 2005;88:84-8.

22.

Padilla L, Radosevich D. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obst Gyn. 2000;4:593-98.

23.

Stewart R, Thistlethwaite J. Routine pelvic examination for asymptomatic women. Exploring the evidence. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37(6):493-6.

24.

Schutter EM, Kenemans P. Diagnostic value of pelvic examination, ultrasound and serum CA125 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. An international multicenter study. Cancer. 1994;74(4):1398-406.

25.

Buckshee K, Temsu I. Pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler sonography as predictors of ovarian cancer. Int J Gyn Obst. 1998;61:51-7.

Titel: Vrouwelijke genitaliën
Auteurs: Drs. E. Hageraats
Drs. A.P. Gijsen
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Fysische diagnostiek
Print ISBN: 978-90-313-5226-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-313-8497-6

Copyright: 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-8497-6_7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Extract

Log in om toegang te krijgen