Abstract
This chapter focuses on clearing some conceptual ground in order to develop a relational sociology of childhood. The discussion is based on the belief that childhood is a fundamentally relational phenomenon; and therefore, the study of children and childhood, and the circumstances of children’s lives, necessitates a social ontology that is consistently relational. Thus, this chapter describes the movement within (“new”) childhood studies toward a relational conceptualization of children and childhood and introduces some of the conceptual innovations made within relational sociologies. Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory is presented as a particularly valuable framework and provides “tool kit” tools for developing a reasoned conception of intergenerationality as well as an ontologically and epistemologically secured foundation for pursuing intergenerational studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alanen, L. (1988). Rethinking childhood. Acta Sociologica, 31(1), 53–67.
Alanen, L. (1992). Modern childhood? Exploring the ‘child question’ in sociology. Publication Series A: Research reports 50. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
Alanen, L. (1994). Gender and generation: Feminism and the “child question”. In Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G. & Wintersberger, H. (Eds.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 27–42). Aldershot: Avebury.
Alanen, L. (2001). Explorations in generational analysis. In L. Alanen & B. Mayall (Eds.), Conceptualizing child-adult relations (pp. 11–22). London: Routledge.
Alanen, L. (2007). Lasten ja aikuisten kentät – Kenttäanalyysi sukupolvisuhteiden tutkimuksessa. In L. Alanen, V.-M. Salminen, & M. Siisiäinen (Eds.), Sosiaalinen pääoma ja paikalliset kentät (pp. 103–124). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
Alanen, L. (2009). Generational order. In J. Qvortrup, W. S. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 159–176). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Archer, M. S. (2010). Critical realism and relational sociology. Complementarity and synergy. Journal of Critical Realism, 9(2), 199–207.
Attias-Donfut, C. (1988). Sociologie des generations: L’empreinte du temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Frabce.
Becker, R. H. (Ed.). (1992). Dynamics of cohort and generations research. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
Becker, R. (Ed.). (1997). Generationen und sozialer Wandel. Generationsdynamik, Generationenbeziehungen und Differenzierung von Generationen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Becker, H. A., & Hermkens, P. L. J. (Eds.). (1993). Solidarity of generations; Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences (Vol. I–II). Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). In other words. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture and Society, 13(3), 19–26.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bradley, H. (1996). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Büchner, P., & Brake, A. (Eds.). (2006). Bildungsort Familie. Transmission von Bildung und Kultur im Alltag von Mehrgenerationenfamilien. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2005). Kindheit und die Ordnung der Verhältnisse. Weinheim/Basel: Juventa.
Camfield, L., Streuli, N., & Woodhead, M. (2010). Children’s well-being in developing countries. A conceptual and methodological review. European Journal of Development Research, 22.3, 398–416.
Clark, D. A., & Gough, I. (2005). Capabilities, needs and well-being: Relating the universal and the local. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking well-being (pp. 45–68). Perth: API Network.
Connell, R. E. (1987). Gender and power. Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Corker, M., & French, S. (1999). Disability discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Corsten, M. (1999). The time of generations. Time & Society, 8(2), 249–273.
Cox, R. (1996). Shaping childhood. Themes of uncertainty in the history of adult-child relationships. London/New York: Routledge.
Dandurand, R.-B., & Ouellette, F.-R. (1995). Famille, État et structuration d’un champ sociale. Sociologie et Societes, 28(2), 103–119.
Deer, C. (2008). Doxa. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 119–130). Stocksfield: Acumen.
Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Ecarius, J. (1998). Generation – ein Grundbegriff. In J. Ecarius (Ed.), Was will die jüngere mit der älteren Generation? Generationsbeziehungen und Generationenverhältnisse in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 7–11). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Fegter, S., Machold, C., & Richter, M. (2010). Children and the good life: Theoretical challenges. In Andersen, S. et al. (Ed.). Children and the good life. New challenges for research on children (pp. 7–12). Dordrecht: Springer.
Finch, J. (1986). Age. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Key variables in social investigations (pp. 12–30). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fitz, J., & Hood-Williams, J. (1982). The generation game: Playing by the rules. In D. Robbins (Ed.), Rethinking social inequality (pp. 65–95). Aldershot: Gower.
Fuhse, J., & Mützel, S. (Eds.). (2010). Relationale Soziologie. Zur kulturellen Wende in der Netzwerkforschung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations. Discussion Paper No. 2004/06. Helsinki: United Nations University WIDER.
Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Hauser, R. M., Brown, B. V., & Prosser, W. R. (Eds.). (1997). Indicators of children’s well-being. New York: Russell Sage.
Hendrick, H. (1997). Constructions and reconstructions of British childhood: An interpretive survey, 1800 to present. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing d (2nd ed., pp. 34–62). London: Falmer Press.
Hengst, H. (2000). Die Arbeit der Kinder und der Umbau der Arbeitsgesellschaft. In H. Hengst & H. Zeiher (Eds.), Die Arbeit der Kinder. Kindsheitskonzept und Arbeitsteilung zwischen den Generationen (pp. 71–97). Weinheim/Basel: Juventa.
Honig, M.-S. (1996). Wem gehört das Kind? Kindheit als generationale Ordnung. In E. Liebau & C. Wulf (Eds.), Generation. Versuche über eine pädagogisch-anthropologische Grundbedingung (pp. 201–221). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Honig, M.-S. (1999). Entwurf einer Theorie der Kindheit. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
Hudson, J., & Lowe, S. (2004). Understanding the policy process. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Jaeger, H. (1977). Generationen in der Geschichte: Überlegungen zu einer umstrittenen Konzeption. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 4, 429–452.
James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press.
Kertzer, D. I. (1983). Generation as a sociological problem. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 125–149.
Lahire, B. (2001). Champ, hors-champ, contrechamp. In B. Lahire (Ed.), Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Dettes et critiques (pp. 23–57). Paris: La Découverte/Poche.
Lane, J. F. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu. A critical introduction. London/Sterling: Pluto Press.
Lenoir, R. (1991). Politique familiale et construction sociale de la famille. Revue Française de Science Politique, 41(6), 781–807.
Lenoir, R. (1992). L’État et la construction de la famille. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 91(92), 20–37.
Lenoir, R. (2003). Généalogie de la morale familiale. Paris: Seuil.
Lenoir, R. (2008). The family as a social institution: Struggles over legitimate representations of reality. In J. Houtsonen & A. Antikainen (Eds.), Symbolic power in cultural contexts (pp. 31–42). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Liebau, E., & Wulf, C. (1996). Generation. Versuche über eine pädagosch-anthropologische Grundbedingung. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Manderson, L. (Ed.). (2005). Rethinking wellbeing. Perth: Curtin University of Technology, Australia Research Institute.
Mannheim, K. (1952/1928). The problem of generations. Essays in the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. London: Penguin Classics.
Maton, K. (2008). Habitus. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 49–65). Stocksfield: Acumen.
Matthes, J. (1985). Karl Mannheims “Das Problem der Generationen”, neu gelesen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14(5), 363–372.
Mayall, B. (1996). Children, health and the social order. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McGillivray, M. (2007). Human well-being: Issues, concepts and measurements. In M. McGillivray (Ed.), Human well-being. Concept and measurement (pp. 1–22). Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Mische, A. (2011). Relational sociology, culture, and agency. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 80–98). Los Angeles: Sage.
Morrow, V., & Mayall, B. (2009). What is wrong with children’s well-being in the UK? Questions of meaning and measurement. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(3), 217–229.
Mützel, S. & Fuhse, J. (2010). Einleitung: Zur relationalen Soziologie. Grundgedanken, Entwicklungslinien und transatlantische Brückenschläge. In Fuhse, J. & Mützel, S. (Hg.) Relationale Soziologie Zur kulturellen Wende in der Netzwerkforschung (pp. 7–35). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Nussbaum, M. (2005). Wellbeing, contracts and capabilities. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking well-being (pp. 27–44). Perth: API Network.
Oldman, D. (1994). Adult-child relations as class relations. In J. Qvortrup, M. Bardy, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 43–58). Avebury: Aldershot.
Olk, T., & Wintersberger, H. (2007). Welfare states and the generational order. In H. Wintersberger, L. Alanen, T. Olk, & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Childhood, generational order and the welfare state: Exploring children’s social and economic welfare (pp. 59–60). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic. Steps in Marx’s method. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 481–495.
Pilcher, J. (1995). Age and generation in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porpora, D. V. (1998). Four concepts of social structure. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism. Essential reading (pp. 339–355). London: Routledge.
Porpora, D. V. (2002). Social structure: The future of a concept. In S. C. Chew & J. D. Knottnerus (Eds.), Structure, culture, and history. Recent issues in social theory (pp. 49–65). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Preuss-Lausitz, U., et al. (1983). Kriegskinder, Konsumkinder, Krisenkinder. Zur Sozialisationsgeschichte seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Prout, A., & James, A. (1990). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–34). London: The Falmer Press.
Qvortrup, J. (1985). Placing children in the division of labour. In P. Close & R. Collins (Eds.), Family and economy in modern society (pp. 129–145). London: Macmillan.
Qvortrup, J. (1987). The sociology of childhood. Introduction. International Journal of Sociology, 17(3), 3–37.
Qvortrup, J. (1993). Children at risk or childhood at risk. A plea for a politics of childhood. In P.-L. Heiliö, E. Lauronen, & M. Bardy, (Eds.) Politics of childhood and children at risk. Eurosocial Report 45/1993 (pp. 19–30). Vienna: European Centre.
Qvortrup, J. (1995). From useful to useful: The historical continuity in children’s constructive participation. In A.-M. Ambert, (Ed.) Sociological studies of children (Vol. 7, pp. 49–76). Greenwich/London: JAI Press.
Qvortrup, J. (2000). Macro-analysis of childhood. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (pp. 77–97). London: Falmer Press.
Qvortrup, J., Bardy, M., Sgritta, G., & Wintersberger, H. (Eds.). (1994). Childhood matters. Social theory, practice and politics. Aldershot: Avebury.
Reed-Danahay, D. (2004). Locating Bourdieu. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.
Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Social emergence. Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science. London: Routledge.
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 471–491.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture & power. The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Thorne, B. (1987). Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children? Gender and Society, 1(1), 85–109.
Turner, B. S. (1999). Classical sociology. London: Sage.
Uhlmann, A. J. (2006). Family, gender and kinship in Australia. The social and cultural logic of practice and subjectivity. London: Ashgate.
Vautier, C. (2008). La longue marche de la sociologie relationnelle. Nouvelles Perspectives en Sciences Sociales. Revue international de systémique complexe et d’études relationnelles, 4(1), 77–106.
Wacquant, L. (1992). Toward a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu’s sociology. In P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 7–59). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wan, P. Y.-Z. (2011). Reframing the social. Emergentist systemism and social theory. Farnham: Ashgate.
Wintersberger, H. (1998). Ökonomische Verhältnisse zwischen Generationen – Ein Beitrag zur Ökonomie der Kindheit. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 18(1), 8–24.
Wintersberger, H. (2005). Work, welfare and the generational order: Towards a political economy of childhood. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood (pp. 201–220). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Alanen, L. (2014). Childhood and Intergenerationality: Toward an Intergenerational Perspective on Child Well-Being. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., Korbin, J. (eds) Handbook of Child Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9062-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9063-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law