Abstract
To assess perceptual interaction between the height and width of rectangles, we used an accuracy variant of the Garner paradigm. We measured the discriminability of height and width (baseline tasks) and size and shape (correlated tasks). From thed′ values in these conditions, we estimated perceptual distances and inferred amean-integral representation in which height and width corresponded to nonindependent dimensions in a perceptual space. This model accounted well for performance in these two-stimulus conditions, and it also explained 70% –80% of the decline in performance in selective and divided attention. In a second experiment, conducted for purposes of comparison with the rectangle discrimination Experiment, we studied the discrimination of horizontal and vertical line segments connected in an L-shape. In size discrimination, observers were equally good with line pairs and rectangles, suggesting holistic perception; but in shape discrimination, they appeared to combine information from the two line-pair components of the rectangle independently. The mean-integral model was again successful in relating performance in the Garner tasks quantitatively.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ashby, F. G., &Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 33–53.
Ashby, F. G., &Lee, W. W. (1991). Predicting similarity and categorization from identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 150–172.
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (1991). A response time theory of perceptual independence. In J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.),Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 389–413). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,38, 423–466.
Ashby, F. G., &Perrin, N. A. (1988). Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition.Psychological Review,95, 124–150.
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Borg, I., &Leutner, D. (1983). Dimensional models for the perception of rectangles.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 257–267.
Dorfman, D. D., &Alf, E., Jr. (1969). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 487–496.
Dunn, J. C. (1983). Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 242–257.
Dykes, J. R., Jr. (1979). A demonstration of selection of analyzers for integral dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 734–745.
Dykes, J. R., Jr., &Cooper, R. G., Jr. (1978). An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 36–42.
Felfoldy, G. L. (1974). Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 453–459.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.
Gourevitch, V., &Galanter, E. (1967). A significance test for one-parameter isosensitivity functions.Psychometrika,32, 25–33.
Graham, N. V. (1989).Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kadlec, H. (1995). Multidimensional signal detection analyses (MSDA) for testing separability and independence: A Pascal program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,27, 442–458.
Kadlec, H., &Townsend, J. T. (1992). Signal detection analyses of dimensional interactions. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.),Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 181–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kingston, J., &Macmillan, N. A. (1995). Integrality of nasalization and Fl in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 1261–1285.
Kingston, J., Macmillan, N. A., Dickey, L. W., Thorburn, R., &Bartels, C. (1997). Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,101, 1696–1709.
Krantz, D. J., &Tversky, A. (1975). Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 4–34.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density.Psychological Review,85, 445–463.
Lazarte, A. A., &Schönemann, P. H. (1991). Saliency metric for subadditive dissimilarity judgments of rectangles.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 142–158.
Lockhead, G. R. (1970). Identification and the form of multidimensional discrimination space.Journal of Experimental Psychology,85, 1–10.
Lockhead, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: A note.Psychological Review,79, 410–419.
Lockhead, G. R. (1979). Holistic versus analytic process models: A reply.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 746–755.
Lockhead, G. R., &King, M. C. (1977). Classifying integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 436–443.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Macmillan, N. A., &Kingston, J. (1995). Integrality, correspondence, and configurality represent different degrees of perceptual interaction, not different types. In C.-A. Possamai (Ed.),Fechner Day 95 (pp. 243–248). Cassis, France: International Society for Psychophysics.
Maddox, W. T. (1992). Perceptual and decisional separability. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.),Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 147–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maddox, W. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 795–817.
Marascuilo, L. A. (1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses.Psychometrika,35, 237–243.
Melara, R. D., &O’brien, T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 323–336.
Monahan, J. S., &Lockhead, G. R. (1977). Identification of integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 94–110.
Posner, M. I. (1964). Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks.Psychological Review,71, 491–504.
Schönemann, P. H. (1990). Psychophysical maps for rectangles. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.),Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 149–164). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.
Schönemann, P. H., Dorcey, T., &Kienapple, K. (1985). Subadditive concatenation in dissimilarity judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 1–17.
Schönemann, P. H., &Lazarte, A. (1987). Psychophysical maps for subadditive dissimilarity ratings.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 342–354.
Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1, 54–87.
Swets, J. A., &Pickett, R. M. (1982).Evaluation of diagnostic systems: Methods from signal detection theory. New York: Academic Press.
Weintraub, D. J. (1971). Rectangle discriminability: Perceptual relativity and the law of Prägnanz.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 1–11.
Wender, K. (1971). A test of independence of dimensions in multidimensional scaling.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 30–32.
Wiener-Ehrlich, W. K. (1978). Dimensional and metric structures in multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 399–414.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macmillan, N.A., Ornstein, A.S. The mean-integral representation of rectangles. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 250–262 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206034
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206034