Abstract
In two experiments, the relation between handedness and the size of the Simon effect in each visual hemifield was investigated. Experiment 1 showed that the Simon effect was larger in the right visual hemifield in right-handers and in the left visual hemifield in left-handers, whereas ambidextrous individuals showed a symmetric Simon effect. In Experiment 2, participants performed the same Simon task as in Experiment 1, but with their hands crossed. The right- and left-handed groups showed a reversed pattern of results with respect to Experiment 1. We explained this phenomenon as a part of a more general account in which perception and action are embedded in a perception-for-action system. In this system, an attentional bias originating from the field of operation of the dominant hand would be at the basis of the relationship between the asymmetry of the Simon effect and handedness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aglioti, S., Smania, N., &Peru, A. (1999). Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 67–79.
Allport, A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Andersen, R. A. (1995). Coordinate transformations and motor planning in posterior parietal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 519–532). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Angrilli, A., Zorzi, M., Tagliabue, M., Stegagno, L., &Umiltà, C. (2001). Cortical plasticity of spatial stimulus-response associations: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.NeuroReport,12, 973–977.
Buxbaum, L. J., &Permaul, P. (2001). Hand-centered attentional and motor asymmetries in unilateral neglect.Neuropsychologia,39, 653–664.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.
Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 837–854.
Gastaldo, S., Umiltà, C., Bianchin, G., &Prior, M. (2002). The Simon effect in schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms.Cortex,38, 149–159.
Graziano, M. S. A., &Gross, C. G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1021–1034). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C.-A., Bonnet, M., &Vidal, F. (1999). Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in humans.Psychophysiology,36, 522–526.
Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection: Evidence for a temporal overlap.Psychological Research,55, 280–290.
Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation.Psychological Research,56, 261–268.
Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (Eds.) (1997).Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Husain, M., Mattingley, J. B., Rorden, C., Kennard, C., &Driver, J. (2000). Distinguishing sensory and motor biases in parietal and frontal neglect.Brain,123, 1643–1659.
Ivanoff, J. (1998).Left- and right-handers distribute their attention asymmetrically on stimulus-response compatibility tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.
Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., &d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Acta Psychologica,79, 115–130.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207.
Mandich, A., Buckolz, E., &Polatajko, H. (2002). On the ability of children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) to inhibit response initiation: The Simon effect.Brain & Cognition,50, 150–162.
Mattingley, J. B., &Driver, J. (1996). Distinguishing sensory and motor deficits after parietal damage: An evaluation of response selection biases in unilateral neglect. In P. Thier & H.-O. Karnath (Eds.),Parietal lobe contributions to orientation in 3D space (pp. 309–338). Heidelberg: Springer.
Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 164–169.
Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes.Psychological Research,56, 144–150.
Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., &Mapelli, D. (1992). Spatial representations of words and nonwords.Cortex,28, 163–174.
Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., &Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account.Psychological Research,65, 170–184.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
Peters, M. (1981). Attentional asymmetries during concurrent bimanual performance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33, 95–103.
Peters, M. (1995). Handedness and its relation to other indices of cerebral lateralization. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdahl (Eds.),Brain asymmetry (pp. 183–214). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Posner, M. I., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain.Annual Review of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.
Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., &Nicoletti, R. (2003). Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?Perception & Psychophysics,65, 1318–1329.
Proctor, R. W., &Wang, H. (1997). Enhancement of the Simon effect by response-location precues: Evaluation of the stimulus-identification account.Acta Psychologica,95, 279–298.
Rabbitt, P. (1978). Hand dominance, attention, and the choice between responses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 407–416.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Roswarski, T. E., &Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks.Psychological Research,59, 196–211.
Rubichi, S., Iani, C., Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1353–1364.
Sheliga, B. M., Craighero, L., Riggio, L., &Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Effect of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses.Experimental Brain Research,114, 339–351.
Simon, J. R., &Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.Journal of Applied Psychology,51, 300–304.
Smania, N., &Aglioti, S. (1995). Sensory and spatial components of somaesthetic deficits following right brain damage.Neurology,45, 1725–1730.
Smith, S. (1914). Right and left handedness.Psychological Bulletin,11, 400–402.
Soechting, J. F., &Flanders, M. (1989). Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.Journal of Neurophysiology,62, 582–594.
Stevens, H. C., &Ducasse, C. J. (1912). The retina and right-handedness.Psychological Review,19, 1–31.
Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.Psychological Research,53, 127–135.
Stoffer, T. H., &Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181–208). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Stürmer, B., Siggelkow, S., Dengler, R., &Leuthold, H. (2000). Response priming in the Simon paradigm: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study.Experimental Brain Research,135, 353–359.
Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., &Paul, M. A. (2001). Reaching affects saccade trajectories.Experimental Brain Research,136, 241–249.
Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., &Baylis, C. G. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 891–905.
Triggs, W. J., Calvanio, R., &Levine, M. (1997). Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemispheric asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance.Neuropsychologia,35, 1355–1363.
Triggs, W. J., Subramanium, B., &Rossi, F. (1999). Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation.Brain Research,835, 324–329.
Umiltà, C., &Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility.Psychological Research,49, 81–90.
Umiltà, C., &Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study.Biological Psychology,43, 147–162.
Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., &Woestenburg, J. C. (1999). The influence of peripheral precues on the tendency to react towards a lateral relevant stimulus with multiple-item arrays.Biological Psychology,51, 1–21.
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 354–360.
Wallace, R. J. (1972). Spatial S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 163–168.
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., &Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 731–751.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by grants from MIUR.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubichi, S., Nicoleti, R. The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 1059–1069 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193709
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193709