Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee Nederlandstalige versies

  • Artikelen
  • Published:
gedrag en gezondheid

Further validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and comparison of two Dutch versions

The first aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of one version of the PANAS that is widely used in Flanders. In a large nonclinical sample (N=3499), the PANAS showed solid psychometric properties. Sex differences appeared: men scored significantly higher on Positive Affect (PA), but significantly lower on Negative Affect (NA), in comparison with women. Six models were tested with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The best-fitting model consisted of two correlated factors corresponding to the PA and NA scales and permitted correlated error. Consequently the hypothesis of complete independence between PA and NA must be rejected. In a second part, we compared our version with a Dutch version (Peeters, Ponds & Vermeeren, 1996). Both translations differed regarding nine items. Our analysis confirmed the psychometric properties of the latter version, and CFA indicated the same model as best-fitting model. Inspection on the item level revealed no considerable differences between the two versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  • Allik, J., & Realo, A. (1997). Emotional experience and its relation to the five-factor model in Estonian. Journal of Personality, 65, 625-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, P.J., Antony, M.M., & Swinson, R.P. (1998). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, trait version: Structure and content re-examined. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 777-788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, M.T.G., & Peeters, F.P.M.L. (1999). Affectieve dimensies bij depressie en angst. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 41, 109-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55, 299-316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J.R., & Henry, J.D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245-265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L.A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 153-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.D., Boxtel, M.P.J. van, Ponds, R., Houx, P.J., & Jolles, J. (2005). Positive affect and its relationship to free recall memory performance in a sample of older Dutch adults from the Maastricht Aging Study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 429-435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joiner, T.E., Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., & Marquina, G. (1997). Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (More) Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 600-615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. (1998). Structural models with observed variables and path analysis: I. Fundamentals, recursive models. In Kline, R.B. (Ed.), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (pp.95-154). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C.J., Hooe, E.S., David, C.F., & Kistner, J.A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 374-386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, G.N., Pallant, J.F., & Kantas, A. (2001). A psychometric comparison of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule across age and sex. Psychological Reports, 88, 861-862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, F.P.M.L., Ponds, R.W.H.M., & Vermeeren, M.T.G. (1996). Affectiviteit en zelfbeoordeling van depressie en angst. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 38, 240-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, H.M. van der, Defares, P.B., & Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst, ZBV. Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, J.A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 345-356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, J.A., & Carroll, J.M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmukle, S.C., Egloff, B., & Burns, L. R. (2002). The relationship between positive and negative affect in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 463-475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terracciano, A., McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131-141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis : understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. (1978). A study of psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 111-121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P., Barter, J., & Brownbridge, G. (1983). On the independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 644-651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1984). Negative Affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded form. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J.W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234-254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zevon, M.A., & Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. www.bsl.nl/shop/

    Ute Engelen

Authors
  1. Ute Engelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven De Peuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. An Victoir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ilse Van Diest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Omer Van den Bergh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Alle auteurs zijn werkzaam bij de Onderzoeksgroep voor Stress, Gezondheid en Welzijn, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, België. Correspondentie-adres: Omer Van den Bergh, Onderzoeksgroep voor Stress, Gezondheid en Welzijn, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, België

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelen, U., Peuter, S.D., Victoir, A. et al. Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee Nederlandstalige versies. GEGE 34, 61–70 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03087979

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03087979

Search

Navigation