Abstract
The diagnostic usefulness of the medical history may depend on the type of problem confronted. It has been suggested that dyspnea is an example of a condition the causes of which cannot be easily distinguished based on identification in the history of stereotypical disease patterns presented in standard texts. To evaluate this assertion, faculty members independently interviewed 146 consecutively admitted patients with dyspnea, and following the history of the present illness, made a diagnosis. After discharge of the patients, another faculty member, using preselected criteria, independently reviewed each record to make a final diagnosis. History-based diagnoses predicted final diagnoses 74% of the time. Therefore, the history appeared to be useful in identifying the primary diagnosis for most dyspneic patients admitted to the hospital. However, it is not known whether this identification provides sufficient rationale for therapy or leads to more efficient use of laboratory tests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. 1975 Summary. DHEW Publication No. (PHS)78-1784
McFarlane AH, O’Connell BP. Morbidity in family practice. Can Med Assoc J 1969;101:259–63
Bain ST, Spaulding WB. The importance of coding presenting symptoms. Can Med Assoc J 1967;97:953–9
Mustchin CP, Tiwari I. Diagnosing the breathless patient. Lancet 1982;1(8277):907–8
Pearson SB, Pearson EM, Mitchell JRA. The diagnosis and management of patients admitted to hospital with acute breathlessness. Postgrad Med J 1981;57:419–24
Pearson SB, Pearson EM, Mitchell JRA. How easy is it to diagnose and treat breathlessness? Lancet 1980;2(8208):1368
Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;29:111–23.
Swinscow TDV. Statistics at square one. London: British Medical Association, 1978
Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, et al. Relative contributions of history taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Br Med J 1975;2:486–9
Crombie DL. General practice today and tomorrow: diagnostic methods. Practitioner 1963;191:539–45
Sandler G. The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests. Am Heart J 1980;100:928–31
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University. Clinical disagreement: I. How often it occurs and why. Can Med Assoc J 1980;123:499–504
Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Tugwell P. Problems in the handling of clinical and research evidence by medical practitioners. Arch Intern Med 1983;143:1971–5
Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. N Engl J Med (two parts) 1975;293:642–6; 695–701
Cochrane AL, Chapman PJ, Oldham PD. Observers’ errors in taking medical histories. Lancet 1951;1:1007–11
Fletcher CM. The problem of observer variation in medical diagnosis with special reference to chest diseases. Meth Inform Med 1964;3:98–103
Fairbairn AS, Wood CH, Fletcher CM. Variability in answers to a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. Br J Prev Soc Med 1959;13:175–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
