Skip to main content
Log in

Fusidic acid in infections of the external eye

Fusidinsäure zur Behandlung von externen Augeninfektionen

  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A newly developed 1% eye preparation of the potent antistaphylococcal antibiotic fusidic acid, showed an excellent clinical effect in 206 Egyptian children with external eye infections. The 248 patients included in the study were randomized, in the ratio 5:1, to either fusidic acid or chloramphenicol 0.5% eye drops. Both preparations were given four to six times daily for one week. Bacterial conjunctivitis was diagnosed in 56% of the children. Offending eye pathogens were mainlyStaphylococcus aureus (60%),Haemophilus aegyptius (10%),Streptococcus pneumoniae (13%) andNeisseria gonorrhoeae (6%). The overall clinical success rate in children with bacterial conjunctivitis was 85% with fusidic acid, compared to 48% with chloramphenicol (p < 0.001). The better effect of fusidic acid could be ascribed to a lower frequency ofin vitro resistance (16%) in comparison to chloramphenicol (55%). Both drugs were apparently well tolerated and no side-effects were observed.

Zusammenfassung

Eine neuentwickelte 1%ige ophthalmologische Präparation des gegen Staphylokokken hochwirksamen Antibiotikums Fusidinsäure erwies sich bei 206 ägyptischen Kindern mit externen Augeninfektionen als hervorragend klinisch wirksam. Die im Rahmen der Studie behandelten 248 Kinder erhielten nach Randomverfahren im Verhältnis 5:1 entweder 1%ige Fusidinsäure- oder 0.5%ige Chloramphenicol-Augentropfen. Beide Präparate wurden eine Woche lang vier-bis sechsmal täglich verabreicht. Bei 56% der Kinder wurde eine bakterielle Konjunktivitis diagnostiziert. Die häufigsten pathogenen Erreger der Augeninfektionen warenStaphylococcus aureus (60%),Haemophilus aegyptius (10%),Streptococcus pneumoniae (13%) undNeisseria gonorrhoeae (6%). Mit Fusidinsäure wurde bei 85% der Kinder mit bakterieller Konjunktivitis ein Therapieerfolg erzielt, mit Chloramphenicol in 48% der Fälle (p < 0,001). Die therapeutische Überlegenheit von Fusidinsäure ließ sich darauf zurückführen, daß dieIn vitro-Resistenz der Erreger mit 16% der Isolate in der Fusidinsäure-Gruppe geringer war als in der Chloramphenicol-Therapiegruppe mit einer Resistenzrate von 55% der Isolate. Beide Medikamente wurden offensichtlich gut vertragen, Nebenwirkungen wurden nicht beobachtet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Fedukowicz, H. B., Stenson, S. External infections of the eye. Third edition. Appleton-Century-Crofts Norwalk, Connecticut 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lacey, R. W. Treatment of staphylococcal infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 9 (1982) 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gransden, W. R., Eykyn, S. J., Phillips, I. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: 400 episodes in St. Thomas's Hospital. Br. Med. J. 288 (1984) 300–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Brien, T., McManus, F., MacAuley, P. H., Ennis, J. T. Acute haemotogenous osteomyelitis. J. Bone Joint Surg. 64 B (1982) 450–453.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cassels-Brown, G. A comparative study of fucidin ointment and cicatrin cream in the treatment of impetigo. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 35 (1981) 153–155.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pakrooh, H. A comparison of sodium fusidate ointment (Fucidin') alone versus oral antibiotic therapy in soft-tissue infections. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 5 (1977/78) 289–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baldwin, R. J. T., Cranfield, R. A multi-centre general practice trial comparing fucidin ointment and fucidin cream. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 35 (1981) 157–160.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Godtfredsen, W., Roholt, K., Tybring, L. Fucidin. A new orally active antibiotic. Lancet I (1962) 928–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varaldo, P. E., Cipriani, P., Foca, A., Geraci, C., Giordano, A., Madeddu, M. A., Orsi, A., Pompei, R., Prenna, M., Repetto, A., Ripa, S., Rosselli, P., Russo, G., Scazzocchio, F., Stassi, G. Identification, clinical distribution, and susceptibility to methicillin and 18 additional antibiotics of clinicalstaphylococcus isolates: nationwide investigation in Italy, J. Clin. Microbiol. 19 (1984) 838–843.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chokkavelu, V., Chandrasekar, P., Rolston, K., LeFrock, J. L., Schell, R. F. Activity of eleven antimicrobial agents against methicillin-, methicillin- and rifampin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Chemotherapy 30 (1984) 97–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aplastic anaemia due to chloramphenicol. Med. Lett. Drugs Ther. 22 (1976) 569.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Bijsterveld, O.P., Batawi, Y.e., Sobhi, F.S. et al. Fusidic acid in infections of the external eye. Infection 15, 16–19 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646112

Keywords

Navigation