Top

Gepubliceerd in:

17-08-2022 | Original Article

An Examination of the Digital Parenting Profiles in Turkey

Auteurs: Fatih Yaman, Işıl Kabakçı Yurdakul, Yavuz Akbulut, Onur Dönmez

Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development | Uitgave 2/2024

Abstract

Internet use among children is increasing. This requires parents to develop digital parenting competencies as they are responsible for their children’s well-being. In the current study the digital parenting self-efficacy perceptions of Turkish parents are examined with regard to the parental role, educational status, age, number of children, and Internet use experiences. Data were collected from a stratified sample of 7150 Turkish parents (i.e., only the mother or father in each family) from twenty-six provinces through the Digital Parenting Self-Efficacy Perception Scale. Descriptive statistics, comparison tests, and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. The findings reveal that the participants’ perceived digital parenting efficacy is high, and that perceptions change in terms of the parental role, educational status, age, number of children, and the Internet use experience.

vorige artikel Initial Effects of a Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention on Parent Emotion Management During COVID-19

volgende artikel Informant Discrepancies in Suicidality Screening Tools Among School Age Youth

Internet World Stats. ([IWS] (2020) Internet usage statistics. World Internet Usage And Population Statistics, Retrieved February 25, 2020, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

We Are Social (2020) Digital 2020. Retrieved February 18, 2020, from https://wearesocial.com/

IWS (2019) World Internet Users and 2019 Population Stats. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 8, 2022 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144

We Are Social (2021) Digital 2021. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2021/01/digital-2021-uk/

Online on the mobile: Internet use on smartphones and associated risks among youth in Europe. Edith Cowan University. Retrieved April 8, 2022 from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/939/

Racz SJ, Johnson SL, Bradshaw CP, Cheng TL (2017) Parenting in the digital age: urban black youth’s perceptions about technology-based communication with parents. J Family Stud 23(2):198–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1108858CrossRef

Cheung CHM, Bedford R, De Urabain IRS, Karmiloff-Smith A, Smith TJ (2017) Daily touchscreen use in infants and toddlers is associated with reduced sleep and delayed sleep onset. Sci Rep 7:46–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46104CrossRef

Livingstone S, Bulger M (2014) A global research agenda for child’en’s rights in the digital age. J Child Media 8(4):317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.961496CrossRef

10.

Aslan A, Karakuş Yılmaz T (2021) Internet Changes in safer Internet use of children in Turkey between 2010–2015 and impact of contextual issues. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2021.9.1.238CrossRef

11.

Holloway D, Green L, Stevenson K (2015) Digitods: Toddlers, touch screens and Australian family life. M/C J 18(5). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1024

12.

Prensky M(2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. Retrieved April 8, 2022, from https://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

13.

Valcke M, De Wever B, Van Keer H, Schellens T (2011) Long-term study of safe Internet use of young children. Comput Educ 57(1):1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.010CrossRef

14.

Yaman, F., Dönmez, O., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. ve Odabaşı, H.F. (2017). Primary school students’ encounters against online risks from the perspectives of schools counselor teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 8 (4), 415-427.

15.

Chang C (2010) Internet safety survey: Who will protect the children? Berkeley Technol Law J 25(1):501–527ADS

16.

Duerager A, Livingstone S(2012) How can parents support children’s İnternet safety? EU Kids Online, London, UK. Retrieved April 8, 2022, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42872

17.

Livingstone S, Davidson J, Bryce J, Hargrave AM, Grove-Hills J (2012) Children’s online activities: Risks and Safety. LSE Consulting: UK

18.

Palfrey J, Gasser U (2013) Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Basic Books, New York

19.

Livingstone S, Byrne J (2018) Parenting in the digital age: The challenges of parental responsibility in comparative perspective. In: Mascheroni G, Ponte C, Jorge A (eds) Digital parenting: The challenges for families in the digital age. Nordicom, Sweden, pp 19–30

20.

Rosen LR, Cheever NA, Carrier LM (2008) The impact of parental attachment style, limit setting and monitoring on teen myspace behavior. J Appl Dev Psychol 29:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005CrossRef

21.

Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., Dönmez, O., Yaman, F., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2013). Digital parenting and changing roles. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(4), 883-896.

22.

Zhao J, Lyngs U, Shadbolt N(2018) What privacy concerns do parents have about children’s mobile apps, and how can they stay SHARP?. KOALA Project Report 1. Retrieved April 8, 2022, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10841

23.

Badillo-Urquiola K, Page X, Wisniewski PJ(2019), May Risk vs. restriction: The tension between providing a sense of normalcy and keeping foster teens safe online. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14)

24.

Appel M, Stiglbauer B, Batinic B, Holtz P (2014) İnternet use and verbal aggression: the moderating role of parents and peers. Comput Hum Behav 33:235–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.007CrossRef

25.

Clark LS (2011) Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory 21(4):323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.xCrossRef

26.

Livingstone S, Bulger ME (2014) A global research agenda for children’s rights in the digital age. J Child Media 8(4):317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.961496CrossRef

27.

Symons K, Ponnet K, Vanwesenbeeck I, Walrave M, Van Ouytsel J (2020) Parent-child communication about Internet use and acceptance of parental authority. J Broadcast Electron Media 64(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1681870CrossRef

28.

TurkStat(2021) Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri (BT) Kullanım Araştırması, 2021. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, 37487. Retrieved August 29, 2021, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2021-37437

29.

Huang RL, Lu Z, Liu JJ, You YM, Pan ZQ, Wei Z, He Q, Wang ZZ (2009) Features and predictors of problematic internet use in Chinese college students. Behav Inform Technol 28(5):485–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701485801CrossRef

30.

Lou SJ, Shih RC, Liu HT, Guo YC, Tseng KH (2010) The influences of the sixth graders’ parents’ Internet literacy and parenting style on Internet parenting. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 9(4):173–184. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v9i4/9417.pdf

31.

Manouselis N, Riviou K, Palavitsinis N, Giannikopoulou V, Tsanakas P (2009) Goneis. gr: Training Greek parents on ICT and safer Internet. Best practices for the knowledge society. Knowledge, learning, development and technology for all. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 97–106CrossRef

32.

Dowdell EB (2013) Use of the Internet by parents of middle school students: Internet rules, risky behaviours and online concerns. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 20(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01815.xCrossRefPubMed

33.

Livingstone S, Bober M(2005) UK children go online: Final report of key project findings. 6. London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/399/1/UKCGO_Final_report.pdf

34.

Farrugia L, Lauri MA (2018) Maltese parents’ awareness and management of risks their children face online. In: Mascheroni G, Ponte C, Jorge A (eds) Digital parenting: The challenges for families in the digital age. Nordicom, Göteborg, pp 135–146

35.

Symons K, Vanwesenbeeck I, Walrave M, Van Ouytsel J, Ponnet K (2019) Parents’ concerns over Internet use, their engagement in interaction restrictions, and adolescents’ behavior on social networking sites. Youth & Society 52(8):1569–1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19834769CrossRef

36.

Baker S, Sanders MR, Morawska A (2017) Who uses online parenting support? A cross-sectional survey exploring Australian parents’ Internet use for parenting. J Child Fam stud 26(3):916–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0608-1CrossRef

37.

Kaşıkcı DN, Çağıltay K, Karakuş T, Kurşun E, Ogan C (2014) Internet habits and safe internet use of children in Turkey and Europe. Educ Sci 39(171):230–243

38.

Mascheroni D, Ólafsson K (2016) The mobile Internet: Access, use, opportunities and divides among European children. New Media & Society 18(8):1657–1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814567986CrossRef

39.

Livingstone S, Blum-Ross A, Pavlick J, Ólafsson K(2018) In the digital home, how do parents support their children and who supports them? Parenting for a Digital Future: Survey Report 1. Retrieved June 29, 2019, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/parenting4digitalfuture/2018/02/06/in-the-digital-home

40.

Anderson M, Smith A, Page D (2016) Parents, teens and digital monitoring. Pew Internet & American Life Project

41.

İnan Kaya G, Bayraktar M, Yılmaz Ö (2018) Digital parenting: Perceptions on digital risks. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 8(1):131–157. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2018.96CrossRef

42.

Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, Ólafsson K (2011) Risks and safety on the Internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. EU Kids Online. Deliverable D4. EU Kids Online Network, London, UK

43.

Sorbring E (2014) Parents’ concerns about their teenage children’s Internet use. J Fam Issues 35(1):75–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12467754CrossRef

44.

Wisniewski P, Xu H, Rosson MB, Carroll JM(2017) Parents just don’t understand: Why teens don’t talk to parents about their online risk experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 523–540). ACM

45.

Wong YC, Ho KM, Chen H (2015) Internet supervision and parenting in the digital age: the case of Shanghai. The Open Family Studies Journal 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2174/18749224015070100112

46.

Ayas T, Horzum MB (2013) İlköğretim öğrencilerinin internet bağımlılığı ve aile internet tutumu [Internet addiction and internet parental style of primary school students]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 4(39):46–57

47.

Samuel A(2015) Parents: Reject technology shame. The Atlantic, November 4, 2016. Retrieved June 19, 2017, from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/11/whyparents-shouldnt-feel-technology-shame/414163/

48.

Özgür H (2016) The relationship between internet parenting styles and internet usage of children and adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 60:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.081CrossRef

49.

Valcke M, Bonte S, De Wever B, Rots I (2010) Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children. Comput Educ 55(2):454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009CrossRef

50.

Yaman, F., Dönmez, O., Akbulut, Y., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Çoklar, A. N., & Güyer, T. (2019). Exploration of parents’ digital parenting efficacy through several demographic variables. Eğitim ve Bilim, 44(199), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7897.

51.

Smith RM(2002) Modern citizenship. Isin, E. F. ve Turner, B. S. (Ed.), Handbook of citizenship studies (p. 105–115). London: Sage

52.

Baker DB(2015) Trustworthy systems for safe and private healthcare. In: V.K. Saba & K.A. McCormick (Eds.), Essentials of nursing informatics (6th edition). McGraw- Hill Education

53.

Chauhan S, Panda NK(2015) Online security. In hacking web intelligence: open source intelligence and web reconnaissance concepts and techniques (p. 203–216). Syngress. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801867-5.00011-2

54.

Halamka JD(2017) Privacy and security. In Sheikh, A., Bates, D. W., Wright, A. & Cresswell, K. (Eds.). (2017). Key advances in clinical informatics: Transforming health care through healXXXnformationion technology (pp. 79–86). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809523-2.00006-6

55.

Jeske D, Van Schaik P (2017) Familiarity with Internet threats: Beyond awareness. Computers & Security 66:129–141CrossRef

56.

Anderson M(2016) Parents, teens, and digital monitoring. Retrieved April 16, 2017, from http://www.pewInternet.org/files/2016/01/PI_2016-01-07_Parents-Teens-Digital-Monitoring_FINAL.pdf

57.

Fletcher AC, Blair BL (2014) Maternal authority regarding early adolescents’ social technology use. J Fam Issues 35(1):54–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12467753CrossRef

58.

Ihmeideh FM, Shawareb AA (2014) The association between Internet parenting styles and children’s use of the Internet at home. J Res Child Educ 28(4):411–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.944723CrossRef

59.

Álvarez M, Torres A, Rodríguez E, Padilla S, Rodrigo MJ (2013) Attitudes and parenting dimensions in pare’ts’ regulation of Internet use by primary and secondary school children. Comput Educ 67:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.005CrossRef

60.

Pediatrics, 140 (Supplement 2), S112-S116

61.

Lauricella AR, Wartella E, Rideout VJ (2015) Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. J Appl Dev Psychol 36:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001CrossRef

62.

Ólafsson K, Green L, Staksrud E (2017) Is big brother more at risk than little sister? The sibling factor in online risk and opportunity. New Media & Society 1461444817691531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817691531

63.

López NMM, Robles ACG, Gómez ACT, Hernández JA (2017) Alfabetización digital a padres de familia en el uso de las redes sociales. Alteridad 12(1):8–19. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v12n1.2017.01CrossRef

64.

Sadiku MN, Tembely M, Musa SM (2017) Digital parenting. J Multidisciplinary Eng Sci Technol 4(1):6454–6456

65.

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH (2012) How to design and evaluate research in education, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, NY

66.

Creswell JW (2014) Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage

67.

Huck SW (2012) Reading statistics and research, 6th edn. Pearson, New York

68.

Bartlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC (2001) Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Learn Perform J 19:43–50

69.

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

70.

Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res 21(2):230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005CrossRef

71.

Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J 6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

72.

Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review. J Educational Res 99(6):323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338CrossRef

73.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS(2012) Using multivariate statistics (6th edition). New Jersey: Pearson

74.

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 8(2):23–74. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-08119-003

75.

Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş (2010) Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara

76.

Meydan CH, Şeşen H (2015) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: AMOS uygulamaları [Structural equation modelling: AMOS applications]. Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara

77.

Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math 20:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7CrossRef

78.

Katz VS, Gonzalez C (2015) Community variations in low-income Latino families’ technology adoption and integration. Am Behav Sci 60:59–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601712CrossRef

79.

Akkaya S, Tan Z, Kapıdere M, Şahin S (2021) Investigation of the relationship between parents’ awareness of digital parenting and the effects of digital games on their children. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22(1):889–917. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.905569CrossRef

80.

Redmiles EM(2018) Net benefits: Digital inequities in social capital, privacy preservation, and digital parenting practices of US social media users. In Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

81.

Cassidy J, Ortlieb E, Ortlieb E (2019) What’s hot in 2019: Expanded and interconnected notions of literacy. Lit Res Instruction 58(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2019.1665786CrossRef

Titel: An Examination of the Digital Parenting Profiles in Turkey
Auteurs: Fatih Yaman
Işıl Kabakçı Yurdakul
Yavuz Akbulut
Onur Dönmez
Publicatiedatum: 17-08-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Child Psychiatry & Human Development / Uitgave 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0009-398X
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3327
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01410-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2024

Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms Moderate the Relationship Between Emotion Dysregulation and Suicide Ideation in Adolescents

Characteristics of the Symptoms of the Proposed ND-PAE Disorder in First Grade Children in a Community Sample

Pharmacological Interventions of Atypical Antipsychotics Induced Weight Gain in the Pediatric Population: A Systemic Review of Current Evidence

The Relationship of Parental Personality Disorders with Offspring Eating Disorders at Childhood and Adolescence Age

Improving Children’s Behavior in Seven Sessions: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Parent-Child Care (PC-CARE) for Children Aged 2–10 Years

Cross-Informant Compatibility of Depression Symptoms in Children: A Network Approach