Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2012 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

3 Doel en type meetinstrumenten

Auteurs : Harriët Wittink, Henri Kiers

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk wordt besproken wat het doel van het meten is (stap 2) en met welk soort instrument gemeten kan worden (stap 3) (zie figuur 3.1). De casus van Yvonne van Balen wordt hierbij als voorbeeld gebruikt.

vorige hoofdstuk 2 Meten als onderdeel van het klinisch redeneren

volgende hoofdstuk 4 Zoeken naar een meetinstrument

Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, and Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002;82:1098–107.PubMed

World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

Beurskens AJ, Vet HC de, Köke AJ, Lindeman, Heijden GJ van der, Regtop W, Knipschild PG. A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:144–8.PubMedCrossRef

Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine 1995;20:341–52.PubMedCrossRef

Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Strom SE. The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: development and preliminary validation. Pain 1995;60:203–16.PubMedCrossRef

Miller, RP, Kopri S, Todd D. The Tampa Scale. Unpublished report; 1991.

Swinkels-Meewisse EJ, Swinkels RA, Verbeek AL, Vlaeyen JW, Oostendorp RA. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. ManTher 2003;8:29–36.

Mayer TG, Barnes D, Kishino ND, Nichols G, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H et al. Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. I. A standardized protocol and normative database. Spine 1988;13:993–7.PubMedCrossRef

Csuka M, McCarty DJ. Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am J Med 1985;78:77–81.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Kirwilliam SS, Derbyshire SW. Increased bias to report heat or pain following emotional priming of pain-related fear. Pain 2007 Sept 17 [Epub ahead of print]

11.

George SZ, Wittmer VT, Fillingim RB, Robinson ME. Fear-avoidance beliefs and temporal summation of evoked thermal pain influence self-report of disability in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:95–108.PubMed

12.

Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000;85:317–32.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lundberg MK, Styf J, Carlsson SG. A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) from a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Pract 2004;20:121–30.CrossRef

14.

Havenaar JM, Os J van, Wiersma D. Algemene meetinstrumenten in de psychiatrische praktijk. Tijdschr Psychiatrie 2004;46:647–51.

15.

Nederhand MJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Turk DC, Zilvold G. Predictive value of fear avoidance in developing chronic neck pain disability: consequences for clinical decision making. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:496–501.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Fritz JM, George SZ. Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. PhysTher 2002;82:973–83.

17.

Jones GT, Johnson RE, Wiles NJ, Chaddock C, Potter RG, Roberts RG et al. Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: a prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:334–41.PubMedCentralPubMed

18.

Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Does recollection error threaten the validity of cross-sectional studies of effectiveness? Med Care 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS77–88.PubMed

19.

Ross M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psych Rev 1989;96:341–57.CrossRef

20.

Beaton DE, Tarasuk V, Katz JN, Wright JG, Bombardier C. ‘Are you better?’ A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:270–9.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Moseley L. Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother 2002;48:297–302.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002;82:8–24.PubMed

23.

Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 2001;81:776–88.PubMed

24.

McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.

25.

Mahoney FI, Wood OH, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients: the influence of complications on the final goal. South Med. 1958;51:609.CrossRef

26.

Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984;64:35–40.PubMed

27.

Wittink H, Wegen E van. Measuring functional status in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. In: Wittink H, Carr D, eds. Evidence, Outcomes and Quality of Life in Pain Treatment. A handbook. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2008.

28.

Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J ChronicDis 1987;40(Suppl 1):55S–69S.CrossRef

29.

Wittink H. Functional capacity testing in patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2005;21:197–9.PubMedCrossRef

30.

ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir. Crit Care Med 2002;166:111–7.CrossRef

31.

Jackson A, Langford NJ. The criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test: replication and extension of previous findings. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989;60:384–7.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the ‘get-up and go’ test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:387–9.PubMed

33.

Gronblad M, Jarvinen E, Hurri H, Hupli M, Karaharju EO. Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain 1994;10:197–203.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998;23:2412–21.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12:119–29.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine 2003;28:2407–13.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Rohrer JE, Arif A, Denison A, Young R, Adamson S. Overall self-rated health as an outcome indicator in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:882–8.PubMed

38.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–99.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Garratt AM, Klaber MJ, Farrin AJ. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine 2001;26:71–7.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C. Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:52–60.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1055–68.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002;324:1417.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

43.

Rogers WH, Wittink H, Wagner A, Cynn D, Carr DB. Assessing individual outcomes during outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment by means of an augmented SF-36. Pain Med 2000;1:44–54.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: 3 Doel en type meetinstrumenten
Auteurs: Harriët Wittink
Henri Kiers
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Meten in de praktijk
Print ISBN: 978-90-313-9222-3

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-313-9223-0

Copyright: 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9223-0_3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen